03-28-2023, 05:56 AM
(这个帖子最后修改于: 03-28-2023, 05:57 AM by mstsumaiyaseoj.)
Dividends are paid over many years so site-wide growth can be years or more of annual growth. To be clear, the quality of an investment is far more important than its size. If you hire a crappy agency for dollars per month and then dedicate a couple of engineers to send them all the advice you can invest in but you certainly won't see the return you hoped for. In fact you could sabotage future investments as companies gradually start to look skeptical about the whole thing. Furthermore, an investment of $10,000 per year is excessive for all but a very small number of companies. In fact I doubt there is a single company in the world that does it every year.
Over $10,000 invested in , although some should be, but the exercise above is really going to take home two points, even though for a non-centric company there may be a go a long way. It's almost impossible to overinvest in good, step-by-step insights that are too valuable for centric companies. How you should structure your investment is now the real question. By now hopefully you are committed to the investing business and have been somewhat convinced by the previous exercise that you may need to do more than complete a one-off review.
![[图: Phone-number-list-14-5.png]](http://zh-cn.esphonenumber.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Phone-number-list-14-5.png)
But how do you actually structure your investment? Hire a very strong team if the budget allows. Give them the resources they need to execute the roadmap they outline. It's that simple in theory, but those two parts tend to go hand in hand in practice. Very difficult. There's no better way to break a program than to have the wrong people run it. At least you're spending resources on projects that don't generate a lot of incremental traffic. At worst you can give the rest of the organization a bad name and make investing in the future more difficult. You'll end up with people whose framework is similar to that.
Over $10,000 invested in , although some should be, but the exercise above is really going to take home two points, even though for a non-centric company there may be a go a long way. It's almost impossible to overinvest in good, step-by-step insights that are too valuable for centric companies. How you should structure your investment is now the real question. By now hopefully you are committed to the investing business and have been somewhat convinced by the previous exercise that you may need to do more than complete a one-off review.
But how do you actually structure your investment? Hire a very strong team if the budget allows. Give them the resources they need to execute the roadmap they outline. It's that simple in theory, but those two parts tend to go hand in hand in practice. Very difficult. There's no better way to break a program than to have the wrong people run it. At least you're spending resources on projects that don't generate a lot of incremental traffic. At worst you can give the rest of the organization a bad name and make investing in the future more difficult. You'll end up with people whose framework is similar to that.